CrossTrade pricing, as their own page states it
$29 / $49 / $99 monthly, $279 / $469 / $949 yearly; 7-day trial; no refunds. Read from CrossTrade's own pricing page on 12 October 2026 — every figure below links to the page it came from.
What CrossTrade charges
Three tiers at “$29 … / month”, “$49 … / month” and “$99 … / month”, each shown beside a lower struck-through figure at the time of checking, with yearly billing at “$279 billed yearly”, “$469 billed yearly” and “$949 billed yearly”. “Every new account starts with a free 7-day trial”, and “You have the flexibility to cancel anytime. We do not provide refunds.”
Source: CrossTrade's own page · checked 12 October 2026
How the number of accounts changes it
Uncounted, on every tier: “Unlimited alerts and accounts — trade how you want”, and “Connect unlimited accounts on every plan. Scaling up never raises your bill.”
Source: CrossTrade's own page · checked 12 October 2026
Where CrossTrade is the better fit
Your accounts are on NinjaTrader 8, or you want to write code against your automation rather than configure it. Both are decided on their side before any other row is read: we do not reach NinjaTrader at all, and our API reads accounts and places nothing. Their Tradovate path is also hosted, so on that platform alone the architectures are the same.
Where Tradeus differs
Your accounts are spread across brokers rather than concentrated on NinjaTrader and Tradovate, and you would rather nothing ran on a machine of yours. Six platforms against two, hosted for every one except MetaTrader 5, and one kill switch that reaches every connected account at once.
No Tradeus plan counts broker connections or accounts, so the price does not move with how many you run. Current prices are on the pricing page rather than here, because they are set at the checkout.
Questions people ask first
Why does this page concede three rows?
Because they are true. CrossTrade reaches NinjaTrader 8, publishes a REST API that trades and ships an MCP server, and none of those three exists here — ours reads accounts and places nothing; the last two were checked against this repository before the row was written, not assumed. A comparison that found us ahead on everything would tell you only that we wrote it.
Why is the risk row blank on their side?
Because we could not source it. They advertise account risk management and an Account Manager, but no page we could open says what it measures or what it does when a limit is crossed. Writing “no drawdown control” would have turned a gap in our reading into a finding against them, in the row where we stand to gain — which is exactly the direction a comparison page has to be most careful in.
The full comparison
Price is one row. Where each runs, what can start a trade, which platforms it reaches and where the limits sit are on the side-by-side page, sourced the same way.
CrossTrade vs Tradeus, row by rowFutures accounts with nothing of yours left running.
Tradovate and Rithmic accounts are copied from our servers, with one kill switch across all of them.