Compare

TradeSyncer vs Tradeus

TradeSyncer and Tradeus agree on the most important thing: both are entirely hosted, and neither asks for a VPS or an install. They separate on the row their own pricing page settles: how many accounts a plan may connect, which TradeSyncer counts by tier and this product does not count at all. On the risk limits their page contradicts itself, and the table below prints both halves rather than the convenient one.

Side by side

Every row is what their own page says.

No row below is our opinion of TradeSyncer. Each one links the page on their site it was read from, so you can check it rather than take it — and any row we could not source that way is not on this page at all.

  • Where the software runs

    TradeSyncer

    Hosted, stated without qualification: “Tradesyncer is a 100% cloud-based trading software. That means no additional software installation, and no VPS. Your copy trading continues even if your computer is offline, ensuring 24/7 operation.”

    Source: TradeSyncer's own page

    Tradeus

    The same, on every plan. A draw, and the row both of these products would rather you compared against a desktop bridge.

  • What can start a trade

    TradeSyncer

    A trade placed on a leader account. Their TradingView page describes it as: “When you place a trade in TradingView, it is instantly copied across all your connected broker accounts in real time …” An inbound webhook endpoint that receives an alert is not mentioned on that page or on their home page — the nearest thing either carries is outbound: “Real-Time Error Alerts — Instant notifications when something fails.”

    Source: TradeSyncer's own page

    Tradeus

    Both. A TradingView alert can reach an endpoint here without a trade being placed anywhere first, which is the difference between copying what you do and running a strategy that does it.

  • Accounts, and what they cost

    TradeSyncer

    Counted per tier on their pricing page: Basic allows 2 connections at 10 accounts each, Pro allows 4 at 20, and Flex allows unlimited connections to a total of 120 accounts, with additional accounts available.

    Source: TradeSyncer's own page

    Tradeus

    Not counted on any plan — no limit on connections, source accounts or target accounts, and no per-account fee.

  • Limits that stop an account being breached

    TradeSyncer

    Their risk-management page says you “can lock out accounts based on time and sessions, Daily Loss Limit (soon), and Daily Profit Target (soon)”. Further down that same page it describes the daily loss limit as working today: it “monitors your Net P/L in real-time across all supported platforms” and on a breach “automatically sends a command to lock trading for that account until the next session reset”. Their page carries both statements; which one is current is a question for them.

    Source: TradeSyncer's own page

    Tradeus

    Daily loss and daily target are live, alongside static, trailing and end-of-day drawdown, trades per day, lockout and a kill switch across every account.

  • Platforms it connects to

    TradeSyncer

    Their supported-platforms page names NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, ProjectX, Volumetrica and ATAS, with Rithmic and dxFeed as data connections.

    Source: TradeSyncer's own page

    Tradeus

    Tradovate, Rithmic and TradeLocker — fewer, and if your firm issues NinjaTrader or Quantower credentials that is the row that decides it.

  • Trial and price

    TradeSyncer

    Basic at $49 a month, Pro at $99 and Flex at $149, each with a 7-day free trial described as full access to all features.

    Source: TradeSyncer's own page

    Tradeus

    A free trial on the middle plan, of the length the checkout states. Current prices are on the pricing page.

Checked against TradeSyncer's own pages on 13 September 2026. Pricing, supported platforms and feature lists change — if a link above no longer says what the row says, the row is wrong and we want to know: tell us. TradeSyncer is a trademark of its owner; Tradeus is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by them. How these comparisons are written.

About TradeSyncer

TradeSyncer is a cloud-based trade copier for futures accounts, sold in three tiers. Its own description is “the most advanced cloud-based trade copier for futures trading”, and it publishes a supported-platforms page and a risk-management page listing which controls exist.

Tradeus is a hosted layer between a signal and a funded account. A TradingView alert arrives at an endpoint, a trade on one account is mirrored to the others, every order is checked against the limits set on the account it is headed for, and anything that would cross one is refused before it is sent. It runs on our machines: there is nothing to install and nothing of yours has to be awake. It connects to Tradovate, Rithmic and TradeLocker, which is what the prop firms our users trade with issue credentials for.

Which one

There is a case for each, and this is it.

Choose TradeSyncer if

Your accounts are on a platform we do not reach. Their list is longer than ours — NinjaTrader, Quantower, Sierra Chart, ATAS and Volumetrica are all on it and none of them are on ours. If that is where your funded accounts are, nothing further down matters.

Choose Tradeus if

You run enough accounts for a per-tier cap to bite. That is the row their own pricing page settles, in numbers attached to named tiers, and it is the honest argument on this page. The daily loss limit is NOT a clean argument for us: their risk page labels it “soon” in one place and describes it working in another, so ask them rather than us — and if the answer is that it works, this comparison comes down to the account counts and the platform list alone.

Questions

What people ask about TradeSyncer and Tradeus.

Their homepage says unlimited follower accounts. Your table says 2, 4 or 120.

Both are on their site, and we cited the pricing page because it is the specific one: it attributes numbers to named tiers. The homepage sentence is about how many followers one leader can copy to, which is a different question from how many accounts a plan lets you connect. If the pricing page changes, this row goes with it.

Their page says “soon” and also describes the feature working. Which is it?

We do not know, and we would rather say so than pick the half that suits us. Both sentences were on their risk-management page on 13 September 2026, which is the date printed under the table. If this row is the one deciding your choice, ask TradeSyncer directly — they can answer it in a sentence and we can only quote a page that contradicts itself. Do not settle it on somebody else's comparison page, this one included.

Do both work with prop firms?

Both name prop firms, and both add the same caution: whether a firm permits copying or automation is set by that firm, changes over time, and has to be read by you. Neither of us can promise you are within your firm's rules.

Keep comparing

The other four, on the same terms.

Or run it against the table.

Every row above links the page it was read from. The one claim neither page can make for you is how it behaves on your own accounts.